August 29, 2007
August 24, 2007
August 20, 2007
August 18, 2007
August 7, 2007
Okay, here's another question ... Opinions please
Have you heard about Jack McClellan? He admits to going to public events to take pictures of young girls. He posts the pictures on his website. McClellan has never been convicted of a sex crime, and police say they have had no legal grounds on which to shut down any of his Web sites because the content and photos posted on them haven't been pornographic.
“My primary physical and emotional attraction is to pre-pubescent girls,”
“I guess the main thing is I just think they’re cute, a lot cuter than women,” he said then. “I admit there is kind of an erotic arousal there.”
"I really think a lot of this pedophilia hysteria is overblown. I think there are a lot of people like me,” “They have the attraction but they're not going to do anything physical because of the laws. It just makes me happy to attend these events."
In another interview, he said, "I got to be honest with you — if it was legal and if it was a completely consensual thing, I could see myself taking it all the way to a sexual" level.
Californians are all up in arms about this and want to pass a law. I heard a radio commentator say that the law should forbid anyone to take a picture of a child in public without the consent of the parent. In the meantime, a judge has issued a temporary restraining order against McClellan which states that he cannot come within 10 yards of anyone under the age of 18 in the state of California.
Now, what do you think? Does he have the right to take pictures of young girls in public places?
“My primary physical and emotional attraction is to pre-pubescent girls,”
“I guess the main thing is I just think they’re cute, a lot cuter than women,” he said then. “I admit there is kind of an erotic arousal there.”
"I really think a lot of this pedophilia hysteria is overblown. I think there are a lot of people like me,” “They have the attraction but they're not going to do anything physical because of the laws. It just makes me happy to attend these events."
In another interview, he said, "I got to be honest with you — if it was legal and if it was a completely consensual thing, I could see myself taking it all the way to a sexual" level.
Californians are all up in arms about this and want to pass a law. I heard a radio commentator say that the law should forbid anyone to take a picture of a child in public without the consent of the parent. In the meantime, a judge has issued a temporary restraining order against McClellan which states that he cannot come within 10 yards of anyone under the age of 18 in the state of California.
Now, what do you think? Does he have the right to take pictures of young girls in public places?
